Home

Take the Money and Run (1969) in the PNW

Details: Written by: Mortado; Category: The 1960s in Northwest Cinemas; Hits: 233

This is a collection of media from the initial runs of "Take the Money and Run" (1969) in the Pacific Northwest.

Click on images for larger versions.

Take the Money and Run (1969)
"Take the Money and Run" marks a pivotal moment in Woody Allen’s early career, crystallizing a comic persona and stylistic approach that would evolve significantly over the following decade. Presented as a mock documentary chronicling the life of an inept criminal, the film adopts a deliberately deadpan tone that contrasts sharply with its subject’s grandiose self-image. This tension between aspiration and reality becomes the engine of the comedy, allowing Allen to satirize not only crime narratives but also the conventions of biographical storytelling itself.

The film’s humor is rooted in understatement and structural playfulness rather than punchline-driven gags. By framing the story through interviews, archival-style footage, and authoritative narration, Allen borrows the language of serious nonfiction cinema and repurposes it for absurd ends. The straight-faced delivery of increasingly ridiculous details creates a cumulative effect, where the comedy arises from the refusal of the film’s form to acknowledge the incompetence it documents. This approach anticipates later mockumentaries, but here it feels especially fresh, reflecting a late-1960s skepticism toward institutions, expertise, and heroic mythmaking.

Visually, the film is modest and unadorned, often resembling television reportage more than traditional narrative cinema. This aesthetic choice reinforces the illusion of authenticity while keeping the focus squarely on performance and timing. Allen’s central character is defined less by criminal menace than by social awkwardness and misplaced confidence, traits that would become hallmarks of his screen presence. The supporting cast, often playing their roles with earnest seriousness, further sharpens the contrast between the film’s documentary posture and its comic content.

Beneath the surface humor, "Take the Money and Run" reflects a broader cultural moment in which authority figures and success stories were increasingly viewed with irony. The film’s protagonist is not a rebel in any meaningful sense; he is a figure of quiet futility, undone by his own limitations rather than by external forces. In this way, the film gently mocks the romanticism of outlaw narratives, suggesting that failure and mediocrity are far more common than legend would have us believe.

While later Allen films would delve more deeply into psychology, romance, and moral ambiguity, this early work stands as a concise and confident experiment in form. Its influence can be felt in subsequent generations of comedians and filmmakers who embraced faux-documentary techniques as a means of social satire. Seen today, "Take the Money and Run" remains a sharp, economical comedy that captures the beginnings of a distinctive cinematic voice, one already attuned to the humor found in human pretension and the gap between how lives are lived and how they are remembered.

Director: Woody Allen
Writers: Woody Allen, Mickey Rose
Stars: Woody Allen, Janet Margolin, Marcel Hillaire
Buy "Take the Money and Run" (1969) DVD on Amazon (SPONSORED)

November 5, 1969 ad (Seattle)

November 2, 1969 ad (Seattle)

November 4, 1969 ad (Seattle)

November 7, 1969 review (Seattle)

November 7, 1969 ad (Seattle)

November 7, 1969 review (Seattle)

December 21, 1969 ad (Portland)

December 24, 1969 ad (Portland)

December 25, 1969 ad (Portland)

December 25, 1969 review (Portland)

December 27, 1969 review(Portland)

Take the Money and Run (1969) poster

Take the Money and Run (1969) trailer
Buy "Take the Money and Run" (1969) DVD on Amazon (SPONSORED)

The Babysitter (1969)/The Fountain of Love (1966) in the PNW

Details: Written by: Mortado; Category: The 1960s in Northwest Cinemas; Hits: 258

This is a collection of media from the initial runs of "The Babysitter" (1969) and "The Fountain of Love" (1966) in the Pacific Northwest.

Click on images for larger versions.

The Babysitter (1969)
“The Babysitter” (1969) unfolds as a sun‑drenched yet faintly claustrophobic portrait of late‑sixties suburban malaise, using the seemingly innocuous figure of a teenage sitter as the catalyst for a slow unmasking of adult desire, hypocrisy, and moral drift. The film operates in that liminal space where exploitation aesthetics meet social observation, presenting a world in which middle‑class respectability is already fraying, and the arrival of a young outsider merely exposes what was simmering beneath the surface.

The story centers on a married couple whose domestic equilibrium is more fragile than either is willing to admit. Their babysitter, a poised and quietly self‑possessed teenager, becomes a mirror reflecting the couple’s unspoken frustrations and unmet longings. Rather than treating her as a simple object of temptation, the film uses her presence to reveal the emotional disarray of the adults around her. She moves through their home with a calm that contrasts sharply with the restless, impulsive energy of the older characters, and this contrast becomes the film’s central tension. The adults project fantasies, fears, and insecurities onto her, while she remains an ambiguous figure—neither naïve nor manipulative, but someone whose youth and independence unsettle the carefully maintained illusions of those who employ her.

Visually and tonally, the film embraces the looser, more permissive style emerging in late‑sixties American cinema. Its pacing is unhurried, allowing scenes to linger long enough for discomfort to accumulate. The camera often observes rather than intrudes, creating a sense of voyeurism that implicates the viewer in the same uneasy curiosity that drives the characters. This observational quality gives the film a psychological edge, even when its narrative leans toward melodrama. The suburban setting, with its manicured lawns and tidy interiors, becomes a stage for unraveling decorum, suggesting that the real danger lies not in youthful rebellion but in the emptiness of adult lives built on routine and pretense.

What makes “The Babysitter” compelling is the way it captures a cultural moment when generational boundaries were shifting and traditional authority was losing its grip. The film’s adults cling to roles that no longer satisfy them, while the younger generation moves with a freedom that feels both liberating and threatening. The babysitter herself embodies this shift: she is neither a symbol of corruption nor purity, but a reminder that the world is changing faster than the older characters can manage. The film’s tension arises from their attempts to reclaim control, even as their desires betray them.

As a piece of late‑sixties exploitation‑adjacent cinema, “The Babysitter” blends titillation with genuine insight, using its provocative premise to explore the emotional voids and moral contradictions of its characters. It is less about scandal than about the quiet desperation that drives people to seek escape wherever they can find it. The result is a film that feels both of its time and subtly critical of the era’s anxieties, offering a portrait of suburban life where the real danger is not the babysitter’s presence but the adults’ inability to confront their own dissatisfaction.

Director: Don Henderson
Writers: James E. McLarty, George E. Carey, Don Henderson
Stars: Patricia Wymer, George E. Carey, Anne Bellamy

The Fountain of Love (1966)
“The Fountain of Love” (1966), directed by Ernst Hofbauer, stands as a revealing example of how German cinema of the mid‑sixties blended erotic fantasy with a quietly observant study of emotional restlessness. Although Hofbauer would later become associated with more overtly sensational material, this film occupies a more introspective register, using its sensual premise to explore the subtle fractures running through the lives of its characters. What emerges is a work that feels suspended between the waning conservatism of postwar society and the rising tide of personal liberation that would soon reshape European culture.

At its center is a man whose life appears orderly and respectable, yet hollowed out by routine. His encounter with a mysterious, alluring woman becomes less a tale of seduction than a confrontation with the parts of himself he has long suppressed. The “fountain” of the title functions as a symbolic space—an imagined site of renewal, vitality, and emotional clarity. Hofbauer treats this encounter not as a scandalous diversion but as a catalyst for examining how desire can expose the fragility of an identity built on duty, habit, and social expectation.

The woman who draws him into this dreamlike interlude is not framed as a mere object of fantasy. Instead, she embodies a kind of emotional directness that the protagonist lacks, a presence that disrupts his carefully maintained façade. Their dynamic reveals the tension between the life he performs and the life he quietly yearns for, giving the film a reflective, almost melancholic tone.

Hofbauer’s direction favors soft lighting, measured pacing, and a camera that lingers on gestures rather than explicit action. This creates a sense of suspended time, as though the characters are drifting through a world where the boundaries between reality and fantasy have thinned. The film’s settings—domestic interiors, secluded natural spaces, and the evocative fountain itself—serve as visual metaphors for the protagonist’s internal state. The contrast between serene surfaces and turbulent emotions becomes one of the film’s most effective devices.

The overall mood is one of quiet yearning. Even when the film leans into sensuality, it does so with a contemplative restraint that underscores the emotional stakes rather than overshadowing them. Hofbauer’s approach suggests that the true drama lies not in transgression but in the recognition of what has been missing from one’s life.

“The Fountain of Love” reflects a Germany in transition, where traditional social structures were being questioned and personal freedom was becoming a more urgent cultural value. The protagonist’s crisis mirrors the broader societal tension between stability and self‑determination. His longing for renewal is not simply erotic but existential—a desire to reclaim a sense of authenticity in a world that has encouraged conformity.

The film’s refusal to moralize is one of its strengths. It observes its characters with a gentle detachment, acknowledging both the allure and the danger of pursuing idealized fantasies. In doing so, it aligns with the European art‑erotica of the period, where intimate stories often served as vehicles for exploring deeper truths about identity, desire, and the shifting cultural landscape.

What makes “The Fountain of Love” compelling is its blend of sensuality, introspection, and cultural resonance. It offers a portrait of a man caught between the life he has built and the life he imagines, using fantasy not as escapism but as a lens through which to examine emotional dislocation. Hofbauer’s film becomes a meditation on the human need for renewal—emotional, sensual, and existential—capturing a moment when both individuals and societies were beginning to question the roles they had long accepted.

Director: Ernst Hofbauer
Writer: Walter Schneider
Stars: Hans-Jürgen Bäumler, Sieghardt Rupp, Eddi Arent

October 28, 1969 ad (Seattle)